Skip to content
LeadHQ

Case study | Building-based prospect research

Finding organisations
with the right building size

For a cold-calling agency supporting a fire-safety service provider, LeadHQ researched Dutch organisations with substantial premises and a plausible role in choosing their own suppliers. We connected building records, operator research and relevant contacts in a file prepared for Steamconnect import.

Buyer
Cold-calling agency
Market
Selected regions of the Netherlands
Target
Independent operators of substantial premises
Research
Building characteristics, operator fit and relevant contacts

01The offer

Ongoing fire-safety services for substantial premises

The agency's client offered long-term service contracts for fire safety and electronic security, covering supply, maintenance and compliance support. The prospecting task was to find organisations whose premises and operations could justify that service.

Sector filters helped find hotels and theatres. Further research established the scale of their premises, who operated them and whether supplier decisions appeared to sit locally or elsewhere in a group.

02The audience

The building and the operator both had to fit

Companies

  • Independent operators and small groups across accommodation, leisure, culture, care, education and other agreed sectors.
  • Locations within the agreed Dutch regions, expanded in stages as the project developed.
  • Substantial premises and sufficient operational scale, assessed using building records and company evidence.
  • Existing customers and prospects screened against the supplied exclusion list.
  • Locations with clear central purchasing constraints excluded from the local calling audience.

People at those companies

  • Facility and technical management first.
  • Relevant property, operations, procurement and safety roles where appropriate.
  • Owners or general managers as fallbacks at smaller organisations.
  • We aimed to find two relevant contacts per company, starting with the priority roles.

Building area supported the fit assessment. It did not establish ownership, the number of installed fire-safety devices or purchasing authority. Unresolved responsibility still needed to be confirmed in conversation.

03The method

From a physical location to a researched prospect

Illustration of the research process

Three inputs, company and sector sources, KVK identity records and BAG building records, merge into a check of operator and premises fit. Organisations that fit move on to finding people on LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, then adding contact details, then preparing the import file with company, evidence and contact fields. Human review informs the next batch, feeding back into the next company-fit check. Building area is a proxy. Purchasing responsibility and interest need confirmation.

Building area is a proxy. Purchasing responsibility and interest need confirmation.

  1. 1Find companies

    Local search, Google Maps, sector directories and existing research provided candidate operators.

  2. 2Check company fit

    Websites, KVK records and BAG building data helped assess identity, location, premises and group structure against the brief.

  3. 3Find the right people

    LinkedIn and Sales Navigator supported role-based contact discovery, with role and employer checked as shown at research time.

  4. 4Add contact details

    Clay supported mobile and work-email enrichment for the selected people. Company telephone numbers were sourced separately.

  5. 5Prepare for delivery

    Company and contact fields were mapped into the agreed Steamconnect import layout. Research context was retained alongside the import fields.

Read the full method
01

Match the operator to the premises

BAG data accessed through PDOK supplied usable floor area and building characteristics. We checked whether the address described the whole operation, several units or only part of a shared building. Where area was unrepresentative, company and operational evidence informed the assessment. Building size remained a proxy for potential relevance.

02

Resolve identity and exclusions

KVK identifiers supported legal-entity matching, duplicate checks and comparison with the exclusion list. Company websites and location pages helped reveal group membership and central purchasing arrangements. A standalone-looking location was not automatically an independent buyer.

03

Validate company profiles before finding contacts

Candidate LinkedIn company pages were checked against company websites and identity evidence. Clay supported profile finding and Apify supported collection and validation. Unresolved matches were withheld. LinkedIn employee ranges and associated-member counts were treated as platform indicators, not exact payroll figures.

04

Keep discovery separate from enrichment

Contacts were selected for the agreed responsibilities before contact details were sought. Mobile numbers were prioritised; email was added where available. A populated contact field did not establish successful reach.

05

Refine the next batch

Human review and iterative feedback informed reassessment of ambiguous records and tighter group checks. Qualification came before contact enrichment.

04Sources and tools

Sources and tools

Local search and sector directoriesRole in this project: Find candidate locations and operators.
Company websites and reportsRole in this project: Assess operations, location, group relationships and scale.
KVKRole in this project: Support identity matching, duplicates and exclusions.
BAG via PDOKRole in this project: Supply address-linked building characteristics, with occupancy limits.
LinkedIn / Sales NavigatorRole in this project: Research companies and relevant roles, checking the employer and role shown at research time.
ClayRole in this project: Support company-profile finding and contact enrichment.
ApifyRole in this project: Support collection and company-profile validation.
Contact data providersRole in this project: Once the relevant people were identified, add email addresses and mobile phone numbers through 20+ different providers.

05Delivered

An import file with supporting research

The delivery combined company details with relevant contact records and fields for building characteristics, group relationships and supporting sources. The import layout placed the company and up to two contacts on one row, with standardised segments and telephone formatting.

The file was prepared for Steamconnect import, giving the calling team company and contact fields in its required layout. Research context accompanied those fields to support review before calling. Field availability varied; reported figures, estimates and unresolved details remained separate.

This case describes research and delivery. It does not claim a measured appointment, revenue or decision-maker reach result.

Example from the delivered file

Contact details withheld

Chassé Theater, an example from the project delivery.

Company and evidence

Company
Chassé Theater
Segment
Theatre / music venue
Structure
Independent theatre foundation
Locations
Single location, according to the research notes
Recorded floor area
Approximately 5,000 m²
Building use
Assembly / meeting use
Building data source
Kadaster
Group assessment
Research notes describe an independently run foundation, outside a theatre chain.

Recorded building area supported qualification; it did not establish purchasing authority.

Contacts

Contacts: Names, email addresses, mobile numbers and profile links are withheld.
Contact 1Role: Head of technical services and facilitiesWork email: Available, withheldMobile: Available, withheldLinkedIn profile: Available, withheld
Contact 2Role: Managing directorWork email: Available, withheldMobile: Available, withheldLinkedIn profile: Available, withheld

Names, email addresses, mobile numbers and profile links are withheld. Fields were populated in the delivery; this does not confirm current reach.

Based on one real delivery record. Contact names and personal contact details are withheld; floor area is rounded. Roles and field availability reflect the delivered file.

100% match against the agreed brief, with free replacements for mismatches

The guarantee covers fit against the agreed criteria. It does not promise buying intent, successful contact, appointments or revenue.

Need prospects selected by more than sector and size?

Tell us which companies you need, what makes them relevant and which people your team needs to reach.

Back to our work

04Your brief

Who do you need to reach?

Tell us about the business and who you want to reach. Rough notes are fine. We’ll help shape the brief.

Prefer a conversation?

Discuss a meeting

1 of 3 · Your offer

* Required

Your team

Rough notes are fine.